By role · Threat Intelligence Analyst

Forty advisories a day. Three that touch you.

Public threat feeds read against your own findings: which CVEs are known exploited, which ones ransomware uses, which are likely next. Then the attack paths from an entry point to the systems that matter most.

See it for your role All roles

What this replaces

Every morning brings forty advisories; none says which apply to your estate.
Severity says critical everywhere, so nothing is.
Nobody can draw the route from a phishing email to the payroll server.

What changes

Known-exploited and ransomware-linked CVEs counted against your own hosts, with CISA deadlines.
Attack paths from entry point to crown jewel, rebuilt from current assets and findings.
Detection coverage per ATT&CK technique, so the next rule closes a named gap.

What you do here

1Check the KEV catalogue against your own findings.
Each known-exploited CVE shows the hosts it sits on and how far past the CISA deadline it runs.
Threat intel
2Separate likely exploitation from loud severity.
EPSS sits beside every CVE in your findings, so likely exploitation is a measured number rather than a hunch.
Threat intel
3Single out what ransomware crews already use.
Findings whose CVE appears in ransomware campaigns get their own count and their own list.
Threat intel
4Map the attack surface from the outside.
Hosts come from certificate transparency, Shodan and Censys, each with its services, certificates and open findings.
Attack surface
5Trace attack paths to the crown jewels.
Paths start at phishing or an exposed service and end at the systems that matter most.
Attack paths
6Read detection coverage technique by technique.
The ATT&CK matrix shows which techniques your controls detect, so the next detection rule targets a named gap.
MITRE ATT&CK